 | | 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Remy de Prez
|
| | | Hi there. Well, after some searching I found the URL's of some of the new 2000 pictures on the official site www.lego.com. I hope you like them (I do). I took the setnumbers from the message (URL) there must be more. Know any? Here they are: (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hear, Hear! Why is there such a push to screw up our relationship with TLG now that we've finally got the beginnings of one? Dave! (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | And WHY do you find it wrong to view pics that are up on their official site? (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | | These are on the OFFICIAL website? why is this wrong? I can access them from their MENU.. not from digging around. I have to say.. I'm getting a little tired of the power hunger around here.. what are we supposed to do? sit on our damn hands and not (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Christian Gemuenden
|
| | | | | | | Mookie, I think you should not take this personal, but as we know do know that TLC is listening us for sure and that they will explain us soon how they would like us to behave towards those new we should wait these few days. I am sure Todd only (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This statement is crap. Why should we now hold back our true feelings and opinions of TLC or anything else? Lugnet has been searchable for as long as I've been here and because of that anyone should know that what's said today can be read (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Christian Gemuenden
|
| | | | | | | | | OK, I had to reply again... your arguments are totally right too, I just thought that we should calm this down a little. If Todd warns us with flaming he must have a serious reason for this. I don't think it is a problem for us to stop discussing (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That might be a bit harsh (like I should talk today ;o) but I agree. Now more than ever is when TLC needs our true feelings and opinions. (...) Yup!! (...) No, I'm a rotten meanie -- look: (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Laura Gjovaag
|
| | | | | | (...) Same here. When I read that some pictures were up on the official site I went looking and found a few without doing any sort of "digging". I can almost understand condemning Remy if the pictures weren't easily accessible, but I had no trouble (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | (...) Neither do I. I mean, I understand cancelling a message when you've messed up and posted twice or something, but to me it seems a little rediculous when someone goes to cancel a post where they sounded stupid or spoke before thinking or (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | |
