 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Brad and colleagues at LEGO Direct: Wow! 8^) Not sure where to begin... Reading through the flood of positive responses, it seems that with one single post you have given hope to thousands of adult LEGO enthusiasts online and to tens of (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) How does this sound as a new charter for lugnet.dear-lego: lugnet.dear-lego: Online communication-to-LEGO channel; formal dialogues with the LEGO Company; suggestions, opinions, likes & dislikes, questions, etc. [Brad, is there anything in the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Not an objection, just a suggestion... Until now, lugnet.dear-lego has been used as (to quote someone else) essentially a "Dear Santa" group. No doubt there will still be times that somone wants to say (scream, whine, throw) something at TLC (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) I agree totally :) (...) I think a new group is certainly warranted for this occasion. It would indeed allow a "fresh start" and open a serious channel of communication. I would sugegst a brand-new group too. (...) -- Thomas Main (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Like for kvetching or a whinging/whining? :-) (...) Hmm, sticky point. (...) If Brad has no objections and could suggest a couple (or more, if he wants) sub-group topic areas that he and/or his colleagues would find most helpful, I'm all for (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| I would think as a minimum we'd need: dear-lego.bulk (requests to add a part to the service) dear-lego.rant dear-lego.sets (discuss what sets to rerelease, if that is ever a possibility - by rerelease, I mean the original set OR a remake like (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Just to clarify, my suggestion was meant to inspire the idea that a new hierchy be established (ie, "lugnet.lego-direct", "lugnet.lego-direct.bulk", etc), rather than skipping straight to segmenting lugnet.dear-lego. If the main group in the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) This strikes me as a Good Idea. James (URL) WAAHOO! (people have been looking at me funny since yesterday afternoon - I just can' stop the occaisional WAAHOO! from coming out. :) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) No, but in the case of splitting the group into subgroups, the original charter wouldn't have to change. It's simply lugnet.dear-lego: Open letters to the LEGO Group (not necessarily to be read by anyone at LEGO) and that doesn't necessarily (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Let's make a lugnet.rant group, then, for people who feel like ranting at nobody in particular. I think lugnet.dear-lego is just too perfect to pass up as a channel to LEGO direct. -Laura's 2 cents (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Yeah, I'm usually not a big fan of "me too" posts, but this is gonna be one, because I'm too tired for anything else. So: Yeah, me too. (24 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
