Subject:
|
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 02:09:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
91 times
|
| |
| |
Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospam__yahoo.com> wrote:
> I ask you honestly - is there a possibility that you are using the fact that
> TLC will most probably not answer you to justify doing something that they
> probably wouldn't like and could hurt the community?
And I ask YOU honestly, isn't the fact that TLC hasn't said anything
about other things on other fan sites taken as implicit permission
to do them?
What's the difference? I'll be happy to eat crow if some TLC
official makes a statement about this, but until then, I'm not going
to accept anyone else's intepretation of these nice steamy entrails
over mine.
> I have no problem with being wrong, it's useful to expect that from time to
> time. But when I know that I could be wrong I would not risk something like
> hurting TLC-FOL relations, without good reason - and "Mummy didn't tell me not
> to paint the dog blue" is not an excuse to do it!
It's an excuse to do other things, though.
As for TLC-AFOL relations, the only relations I see are the AFOLs
spending money on TLC's products and having ... none? of their
ideas/requests/offers given any consideration at all.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|