| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > You don't see anything wrong with defecating all over a company's publicity
> > and intellectual property rights regarding information which was, up until
> > two days ago, a trade secret. Wonderful.
>
> There is no way you will convince me that MegaBloks or many other competitors
> HAVEN'T already seen those pics, not if their spies are doing their jobs
> properly. That no longer makes it a trade secret to me.
I read somewhere that the brain makes a decision on something then
rationalises afterwards, that a whole part of the brain is dedicated to
thinking up excuses to arbitarily made decisions. But maybe someone more
knowledgable can help me on this?
Whether a secret is really a secret is immaterial to the person who's secret
it is. This isn't about what we think/hope might be the case. It's about what
we can safely deduce is TLC's position on this. If they would fire an employee
for showing a retailers catalogue before release then it is safe to assume
that they don't apprieciate it, and that it IS important to them. TLC being a
very employee concious company remember.
This "They probably don't care, and it doesn't matter", may be true - but with
the available evidence it is rationalisation, wishful thinking.
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
