Subject:
|
Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Dec 1998 13:05:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2901 times
|
| |
|
|
Once upon a time, janssenjasper@hotmail.com (Jasper Janssen) wrote:
> How about: You keep all ther Newsgroup: Headers, but just don't
> process them. i.e., lugnet.* is in the header, but it still doesn't
> show up on the lugnet.* group.
But when a lugnet'er posts a follow-up to one of those messages, the
follow-up will go to those lugnet.* groups. Technically, I don't think
it's a problem, but it will fragment threads.
And if the original message had other Usenet groups, the lugnet'er's
follow-up will bounce because of the extra newsgroups.
If lugnet.com is changed to ignore invalid/unrecognized entries in the
Newsgroups header, then someone could use lugnet to post to any Usenet
ng, as long as the article was cross-posted to RTL.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
| On Wed, 2 Dec 1998 13:05:54 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote: :If lugnet.com is changed to ignore invalid/unrecognized entries in the :Newsgroups header, then someone could use lugnet to post to any Usenet :ng, as long as the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
| On Mon, 30 Nov 1998 20:54:15 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote: :I'm thinking really hard on this, but I'm not sure there is any _clean_ :solution other than allowing at-will cross-posting between RTL and :lugnet groups. : :This is (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
132 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
