 | | Re: How to properly "announce" MOC's
|
|
(...) I like Lugnet. It fills a void in that the listings for the sets are easy to use and link to other sites. It is a straight forward site without a lot of the bells and whistles that make others rather difficult to use. The only complaint is the (...) (16 years ago, 5-Jul-08, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET in its Senior Years? (was Re: How to properly "announce" MOC's)
|
|
There is a lot here I would be devastated to lose. Lugnet remains an excellent centre point for news, and one of the few places where different themes come out of their niches and mix. Sentimental value as well... All the best and God Bless, Nathan (16 years ago, 5-Jul-08, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO(R) workers opt for pragmatism as they brace for more lay-offs
|
|
(...) This article might help explain some of that pragmatism: (URL) (16 years ago, 4-Jul-08, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What sets include lots of dark green?
|
|
(...) BNSF, for one. Some of the Crystal Skull sets have some nice new pieces, and there are a few Exo-Force sets if you're looking for some of the more angular wedge/slope pieces. (16 years ago, 4-Jul-08, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET in its Senior Years? (was Re: How to properly "announce" MOC's)
|
|
(...) Adrian, I sort of agree with you as the technology behind the current version of LUGNET was very sophisticated and advanced way back when... ...but there certainly are other ways to provide a lot of the functionality now. That is why of course (...) (16 years ago, 5-Jul-08, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
