|
|
 | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) No Dave Eaton test will ever truly wash away the taint on you, Keith, but as long as you keep building monstrously dictatorial dioramas, we'll still love you. Aaron (18 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Alright, I sneakily changed how it calculates things behind-the-scenes, so... you're still low, but not *AS* low. Basically, I was using a weighted average and a straightforward "distance from the mean" method for calculating scoring. I now (...) (18 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Wow, I'm even worse... I feel dirty! Anyway thanks, nice to see what is the general trend :) Would it be possible also to show the overall general score? Cheers, Matija (18 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Dave that was fun. Apparently I'm 8.25 on your purity scale. I feel all fresh and clean. Like a summer's day. (URL) Thanks, -Keith. (18 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Yeah, I thought about that at first-- more of a standard "Purity Test" rather than a "Lego-Purism" test. A "have-you-ever" sort of deal, to tell how much of a Lego Saint you were or something. But then I started thinking about it, and, well, (...) (18 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
