 | | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Ditto BIG TIME. LEGO rocks. Jake Rocks. Fans of LEGO rock when they aren't complaining about an issue that has been worn threadbare. Let's get back to 'playing well'... Nathan Wells (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ted Michon wrote: (snip and not picking on Ted in particular) I will not dispute, and *have* not disputed, the validity of the color topic as a topic that can and should be discussed on LUGNET. However I dispute that it is an (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) Oops--FUT to colour I should know better... (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) People can wax poetically all they want about how dumb it was for Chevrolet to stop making '57 convertibles. There comes a certain point, however, when the rant, tirade, tiff, eloquently posted and well thought out with corresponding bullet (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Randall et al- Ah, but what is "the good of the community"? Certainly "the community" is not the same as LEGO's core market. Our community is a niche of serious LEGO builders, both kids and adults, who prize the value of the highly flexible, (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) Hi Jindrich, For me, your statement read as you meant it. Everyone can see usefulness of studdless beams. I've been pondering this studded/studless discussion for a while now, and I think I understand my handicap. There are two technic (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Good logic. That's exactly like saying, if you hate the whining so much, stop reading LUGNET. (...) How do you know? They may respond if enough people voice their opinion. (...) Yes, I think Jake is doing a great job. Thanks, Jake. That said, (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) XFUT --> .color (please!!) ++Lar (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Me too. ...SNIP... I agree with your entire post. Thank you for putting it so eloquently. Dean (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) [...] (...) XFUT --> .color -Tim (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) So the people who are still concerned should shut up - just for the single reason of you being fed up with hearing critical voices? Who the **** do you think you are? OK, back to normal. While the american AFOLs have mostly surrendered, there (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
(...) How about a program to automatically write rants, you click on easy buttons which automatically enter commonly used phrases. When you have finished, it gives you a rating based on how many times you have used caps lock, underline and italics. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) [snip] Randall, though I'm also starting to tire of the colour issue, I would like to say that LEGO is whatever you want it to be. TLC call it a toy and target kids (mostly), but that's just their marketting - whoever buys it can use it how (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Randall Lee Crabtree wrote: -snip- (...) -snip- (...) -snip- In lugnet.general, Michael Harrod wrote: -snip- (...) -snip- Ah, the irony... Even more so that the call to "GROW UP" isn't directed to .color. ;-) Cheers Richie Dulin (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
To LUGNET users: I would just like to say, for the record, that I totally agree that Jake's doing the best job he possibly can. I have not, would not now, nor would I ever blame or flame him for any problems I have with the company since they're (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
I don't have a beef with the click-hinge parts at all as an addition to the Legoverse, but if you look at Purple Dave's post he'll give you some examples of how click-hinges are, in fact, replacing all the old fingered hinged pieces. I don't mind (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Here here!!! Thank you, Jake. Time for the rest of you to GROW UP!!!! Play On!!!! M (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
On 20:20 07/13/2004, Larry Pieniazek wrote (...) So monthly they could get a message 1 or 0 with the magic of IT, of course --- wubwub aka stephen f roberts wildbrick.com - Jain's Guide : Promoting more than just the MOC (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
(...) Too many characters. Why not just do a Geek Code subset to explain how peeved (or unpeeved) you are? (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
On 16:55 07/13/2004, Kerry Raymond wrote (...) You do not go far enough! We could further save bandwidth by taking everyone's generated opinions and converting them into a handy string of numbers that represent their feelings on issues. (all done (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
