|
|
 | | Re: We Build For Fun, Right? (was Re: Announcing new legend!)
|
| (...) It doesn't bug me. If they're only going to stick around to complain, then I'd rather not have to filter through their posts. (...) Yes, I think it's quite extreme. It puzzles me, but it doesn't upset me. To each his own. -Tim (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
| (...) Tim, Agreed. Yes, there are some strong arguments on each side (I have yet to voice my concern for it, let alone for parts) but I think we should talk about set concepts and theme issues and sweet MOCs. Also, "Hello to you" as I haven't spoken (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | We Build For Fun, Right? (was Re: Announcing new legend!)
|
| (...) It was that last sentence that really got me thinking. Some posts I've seen put up about going into a "quasi-dark-age" have just left me uneasy. There is nothing wrong voicing displeasure with what LEGO has done but to take as far as "That's (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
| Great news Jake, and thanks for the heads-up! Hopefully there are a few more in the works :) James (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
| (...) So when will enough have been said? When the thread reaches 300 posts? 400? 1000? When the change is finally reverted [1]? From reading your posts, I don't think it will _e.ver_ be enough for you. Not even if you get your way in the end, (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
|
