 | | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) While this may be the "ideal" scenerio, it is also the one that is least likely to happen. Todd and Suz have done a great thing here with Lugnet. Lets keep in mind, however, that Lugnet was SUPPOSED to be the all-encompasing site for Lego fans (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) Minifigs are one of the huge appeal of Lego, at least to people from my generation. (The first sets I had had the armless variety.) Mucking with that doesn't seem like a great idea to me either. (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) I think he's saying that if you want fleshtoned figures that have some of the other features you ask for, maybe Playmobil may suit your needs better. I'm not sure I agree. but I am also not sure I think that changing from yellow to fleshtones (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) What is your point? That because Playmobil uses flesh tones TLC shouldn't? I'm sorry but I don't get your drift. JOHN (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) LUGNET leaves a lot to be desired as a single point of entry, I think. It's confusing to navigate - especially for newbies, and doesn't do a good job of linking out to other sites from obvious places - ie guide.lugnet.com/shop doesn't even (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) Hmm, I don't know, guys. I see a lot of the above mission either already being taken care of by LUGNET, or being something that LUGNET could grow into. However, I do love the idea of a single point of entry for newbies...Eight or ten years ago (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) This sounds pretty interesting. You mention that a lot of it is coded - do you have a description of what's already created, such as specifications, proof of concept code, features, programming language(s) used, etc.? I'd like to follow this, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) I agree with Jon here. LUGNET is a good thing, it allows us to discuss serious aspects of our hobby with other like-minded folks, but its time to start looking ahead to integrating all of the wonderful community resources out there in a (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) (snip) Bearing in mind that I adore LUGNET, I think this post and this way of thinking is extremely important for the future of our community. All developers within ear shot should think about it. I'm barely a graphic designer but I would (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Source for mini-lights (modding!)
|
|
(...) Yes, thank you for the link - I have a Lee Valley near my house and will definitely be buying a bunch of these for my space and castle creations. Regards, Nick M. Gill (22 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
