To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / *41949 (-10)
  Re: High praise for Designer Set #4100
 
The morning after I read your review I got the set for my birthday! You're absolutely right. But rather than just a 'metoo' post I wanted to add something. What I really like about the models (I've only built a few so far) is that none of them is (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Some Weird Action Team turns 4 years old!
 
(...) Oh, okay. Thanks, but I was wondering if you knew any kind of free web hoster ((URL) for instance) although different. I tried to make a site once, I didn't get any visitors except for me, and it was hard. Also, do you have any tips on making (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  After a failure you have to bounce back
 
Well, Last question of Top 10 lists was: Top 10 LEGO recors it would be fun to watch someone break. It didn't generate enough answers, so we dropped it. Apart from stucking parts up your nose or swallowing then, there was nothing really interesting. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.fun, lugnet.announce) ! 
 
  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
I went the other way once in a Sunday morning service some time ago. I made a parable using an ordinary LEGO brick, a LEGO minifig gun, and a 100% compatible 2x4 clone brick. I asked some children to point out which one was not a Lego part, and of (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  To Thomas Stangl (positive stuff)
 
Hey Tom, this is Nick. After reading over the various posts, I still stand by my "my comment was stupid" post and think that the whole argument was stupid anyway. Lets just forget about it. I can actually see your point of view. Truce? Thanks, ~Nick (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating
 
(...) Oh, come now. Read all my posts on Lugnet. Not just the ones in .debate or just this thread, ALL of them. Then come back and tell me I like to see how much trouble I can stir up. -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating
 
(...) I've flamed very few people on Lugnet. Maybe you just have a sore spot because you were one of them? (...) Well, we agree on something else. I find you too obnoxious for words too. Of all the people on Lugnet I ignore, Scott is the #1 on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating
 
(...) Yay, great, a Believer!... (...) Hrm, uh, er, maybe not... (...) Yay, he Believes again!... (...) Nevermind, he's degenerated into calling me insane... NOTE: ;-) END NOTE. I'm politically incorrect, but progressive (I consider Political (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Obnoxious geekdom
 
(...) You have no idea just how high the scale goes, you should see some of the things people have showed me over the years. I was pretty impressed by the Palm OS BrikWars calculator, and then there was a guy who made a Java app that let you play (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: how odd!!!!
 
Well, whatever else they are, they look like they are quite old. I don't think that the molds for the 2 x 4 bricks have the injection points on the ends like that any more. I can remember when I was a kid, those points ( dots, really) annoyed me (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR