 | | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
(...) I hate to beat this to death, cause I'm sure it makes me look like an awful person, but it still rubs me the wrong way... (...) "All Gallery content is property of the uploader, unless otherwise stated." So, indirectly, the person who copied (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:H8qIDz.938@lugnet.com... (...) First of all, the person that have copyed your image do not claim that it is his/her work. And since the picture is not altered or renamed, and you have not made (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Artists immortalised in Lego (BBC News)
|
|
James J. Trobaugh wrote in message ... (...) Apparently, the rampant commercialism is a kind of "statement": "Cake & Neave are concerned with the appropriation of themselves and of art. They have transformed themselves into two highly loveable and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
"Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:H8rpp2.8oK@lugnet.com... (...) SEE SIG! Let's not dis The Lego Group Lego is not a toy: it's a way of life! Build on! swrunyan@uswest.net (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
Bram, You could start "watermarking" your images, then at least when some one "borrows" your images your name would be on there some where....unless they go thought the trouble of photoshoping out the watermark. jt (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|