 | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Hm. Apparently I'm a bit more liberal in my categorizations, as Bruce does have a valid point in LEGO/store communications. A counterpoint to this, though would be while the first two could constitute leaks, the Marz site would not...to a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Tough question. A leak is an item of information that is NOT meant to be released. Most, if not all of your examples that you cited were meant to be released to, at least initially, to the dealers who sell LEGO. As such, I wouldn't list these (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
Paul, The policy at fbtb is that there should be no discussion of leaks. The policy at lugnet, on the other hand, is pretty much anything goes. So feel free to discuss these here at Lugnet, but refrain from doing so on fbtb. As to your examples, the (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Understanding Leaks
|
|
Hi All, This may have been covered before, but as a relative newbie, I'd like to better understand what is meant when people talk about "leaks." I've noticed a number of folks talk about leaks in both LUGNET and FBTB, and gotten the impression that (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | BrikTrak 2002 build 220 now available.
|
|
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to let those of you who use it know that a new version of BrikTrak 2002 has been posted on the website. This version fixes a very obvious bug in previous versions; it no longer expires after December 31st 2002! (Sorry about (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
"Avi Parvin" <parvin@netvision.net.il> wrote in message news:H8B4pB.n5@lugnet.com... (...) (Don't (...) When the set is avaiable I will buy a few sets and try everything :) (Hope there is a tank in the set, because I dont have one yet) The fun with (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
"Avi Parvin" <parvin@netvision.net.il> wrote in message news:H8B4pB.n5@lugnet.com... (...) solved (...) to (...) Th family car is an idea I like to see more of too. But, let's take a moment to look at the auto manufactures and market consists of in (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerning this new train poll
|
|
(...) Who has made the last couple train-related polls? And why would he mention the subject now? (...) E=MC² (...) Seems to me that the numbers speak for themselves (...) There is no particular measure to 'fun', everybody enjoys a different degree (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about that, perhaps the liftarm is just to support the knob. (...) I think the red thing is just the handle at the end of the hose. (...) That was also my initial thought. But... I think it's too good to be true. (...) Wow! What a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerning this new train poll
|
|
(...) Hi Harvey, it has been me, who criticised your poll. Larry was only jumping in much later in the thread and he did not even uttered your name, was NOT speaking about your poll, but about making up polls in general. ***...*** Really, if people (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
