Subject:
|
Re: Legality query...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:49:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5133 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.gaming, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> > In lugnet.gaming, James Brown wrote:
>
> > > I would like to retain the intent (don't make money off this game) of
> > > "...I require that no revenue..." but I also want to allow people (like
> > > me!) to charge a nomonal fee (like $2) to run Brick Battles at
> > > conventions (like GenCon!).
> >
> > I'm no lawyer, but if it were me I'd just say, "no revenue may be generated by
> > the use or distribution of these rules, except in special circumstances with the
> > express written consent of the author."
>
> Does that mean people would need to ask your permission to use it at Gencon
> then??? That's sort of the way that reads to me.
Yah. I'd like to have it be a no-maintanance 'you can charge people to play,
but you can't make money off it' disclaimer.
And I'd like it to be short and succinct. I realize these two goals may be
mutually incompatable...
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Legality query...
|
| (...) Does that mean people would need to ask your permission to use it at Gencon then??? That's sort of the way that reads to me. (21 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.gaming)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
