Subject:
|
Re: Legality query...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:11:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4581 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> In lugnet.gaming, James Brown wrote:
> > I would like to retain the intent (don't make money off this game) of
> > "...I require that no revenue..." but I also want to allow people (like
> > me!) to charge a nomonal fee (like $2) to run Brick Battles at
> > conventions (like GenCon!).
>
> I'm no lawyer, but if it were me I'd just say, "no revenue may be generated by
> the use or distribution of these rules, except in special circumstances with the
> express written consent of the author."
Does that mean people would need to ask your permission to use it at Gencon
then??? That's sort of the way that reads to me.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Legality query...
|
| (...) Yah. I'd like to have it be a no-maintanance 'you can charge people to play, but you can't make money off it' disclaimer. And I'd like it to be short and succinct. I realize these two goals may be mutually incompatable... James (21 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.gaming)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legality query...
|
| (...) I'm no lawyer, but if it were me I'd just say, "no revenue may be generated by the use or distribution of these rules, except in special circumstances with the express written consent of the author." - Mike. (21 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.gaming)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
