|
| | Re: Lego Warcraft would be soooo cool...
|
| (...) Blizzard moved from Irvine, California? (...) I like the idea, but better to pitch it to whomever has the Lego software rights than to Blizzard. I imagine the actual depiction of Lego violence would freak Lego - no matter how appropriate to (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Lego Warcraft would be soooo cool...
|
| (...) Wow, think of the possibilities! You could have different people forming clans with their groups of people. There could be stronger units available as you progressed through the game, such as huge dragons bearing it's force's insignia. Great (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: New Game (Long)
|
| In lugnet.fun.gaming, Mike Rayhawk writes: <snipped> (...) It ain't no joke! Here's some more info for everyone: Construction- Instead of building vehicles according to the games construction rules as in Lego Wars, the construction rules are written (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.gaming)
| | | | Re: New Game
|
| (...) I'm not sure that 'non-anoraky' came from anywhere really! But it makes more sense when you understand the term 'anorak', which I'm not sure has much alternative usage outside the UK.. so I'll describe *that* as best I can. Essentially it (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.gaming)
| | | | RE: Lego Warcraft would be soooo cool...
|
| How about modifying Team Fortress(Quake) or Team Fortress classic[Half-Life]...Imagine an assasinate timmy map :) Benjamin Whytcross BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au Ph: (03) 9856 5282 Directory Technology Pty Ltd 1/436 Elgar Road, Box Hill, 3128 (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |