 | | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) snip (...) Hey Dan. That wasn't intended. I will send it again now. Let me know if it looks okay... -SM Hendo (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) Hendo, one minor problem. All I got for the Hell's Fury was: Starship: VALCENTRAL: USS Hell’s Fury (URL) Status: USS Hell’s Fury === Coordinates: Orbiting at G1; Away Team at Formian Colony Clanesk, Darpenime No actions. Maybe this was (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RulesTalk: SMs and Running more than one Sector
|
|
All looked eminently sensible to me. I'd only reinforce the point about the need to ensure that as an SM one is up to running two sectors. I have had on average 6 or 7 ships active in New Pacific most of the time, and for me that's a chunk to do. (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
Galactic Greetings! Travel reports have been emailed as appropriate. There have been a lot of new ships in recent weeks, so if anyone feels they have been missed, please let me know. I also mailed out actions for my sectors as needed. And finally, (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | RulesTalk: SMs and Running more than one Sector
|
|
Hi all, I was discussing this with Avery by email, and I think it is worthwhile to share my comments here for everyone to review. If you disagree with anything I say, feel free to share... By email, I said: Hey Avery! Sorry I am just getting back (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
