 | | Re: .castle's problem
|
|
(...) Late night post == Incoherent (...) Again, I couldn't make the words represent my real thoughts. A quick two-mile jog and now I'm sorted out again. What I wanted to convey was that I don't see why there should be a problem. We discussed this, (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: .castle's problem
|
|
(...) Hmmmm. Careful, .castle dudes read outside .castle too. AND even non .gaming.starship dudes have a right to their own special blend of the Obsession :-) (...) Mmmmmm. Again, Careful. I don't know that we are all that veteran. My sense is that (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Is the Outer Rim Active?
|
|
(...) I think one of my vessels has been waiting at the outer marker since early in July. Is there something I should be doing too? Richard Still baldly going... (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | .castle's problem
|
|
Hey all This is probably the wrong place to post, but I thought I'd get some opinions from people who know what they're talking about. .castle has a problem, that goes without being said. I've been following a large discussion over the past weeks (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | New Pacific action emails up to date
|
|
All New Pacific players who responded during the week will have received action emails. Errant Kangaroo Magellan Glimmer of Hope Carpathian USS Katheryn I note that I did not receive anything from: Junk Ship DC3 Terrorformer MS-0001 DAC Arrakis so (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
