|
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
| (...) What??? ====== Is this the same LFB who made this... (URL) Now, if you made a space ship with that dark gray... -JHK <http:/jhkruer.com (URL) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
| (...) Oooh! A thread with colors, and HEY! .starship has over 100 posts now! :) Oh, and Lindsay, as for lack of brick, ABS-related CAD are allowed. You may use any scale you like (mini-fig-, micro-, nano-, macro-, etc.). As for your interjections, (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| | | | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
| (...) Heck no! Get in here :-) (...) I agree completely. (...) The tiers are more a guide to the GM and SMs, and other players. The propulsion tiers impact on galactic movement, but not much on in-sector movement (GM monitors and administers) (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| | | | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
| In lugnet.gaming.starship, John P. Henderson wrotemore worthiness. (...) I guess I am (sorry :-). (...) I wonder even if we end up with a 'Full Jump Engine' setting, a 4th and super setting, of which we are each only allowed one. I appreciate your (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| | | | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
| Hi! If I may interject, as someone who's mulling over joining up (unless my lack of any actual Brick at the moment is an intent-killer) and has read the rules as a fresh outsider: (...) This sounds fair. Otherwise, no significant gain is made by (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| |