Subject:
|
Re: New fantasy battle rules....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 May 2001 13:48:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.fun.gaming, Shaun Sullivan writes:
>
>
> Mike Rayhawk wrote:
>
> > In wizards.dnd.chainmail, msucymbal writes:
> > > There are alot of user-created rules for wargames out there, even some for
> > > LEGO(tm), but nothing that is really well-written.
> >
> > Oh! You wound me!
Hello Mike (and Shaun),
Where do I begin? I am _really_ sorry the way that came out. I really
do enjoy your Brikwars rules. In my fervor to gush about the Chainmail
rules, I gave your ruleset a back-hand slap, and I apologize. I don't want
to alienate myself from this group because you guys are real cool and have
great ideas. I am looking forward to your 'Brikwars 2001'.
Humbly yours,
T.J. Mitchell *hangs head in shame*
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New fantasy battle rules....
|
| (...) Ha ha it's all good, I was just joking around about the wound and all. Secretly I half agree with you - by coincidence I was just having a conversation with Dave Brown a few days ago about how professionally-written BrikWars isn't, taking the (...) (23 years ago, 6-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New fantasy battle rules....
|
| (...) Oof! You wound him! Actually, don't get me started on the volumnuous (sp?) merits of Brikwars ... I can extemporaize for hours about this wonderful system, and I still haven't even gotten on Mike's payroll yet. -s (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
