Subject:
|
Fire when Ready.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:50:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
969 times
|
| |
|
|
Not particularly being a history junkie and being a bit of a lazy git. I'm
asking a question here that I probably should be able to answer for myself.
Anyway, What are the diffenences between a longbow and a musket in terms of
range, damage caused, accuracy, ease of use etc.
It's been pointed out that in Brikwars the comparison comes down in favour of
the longbow. If that's accurate to history, why the switch to gunpowder?
Some Brikwars stats
LongBow (and quiver) TL:2, CP:3, Range:12", UR:5, Damage:1d6+2
Musket TL:3, CP:5, Range:12", UR:5, Damage:1d6(slow)
James (who can't think of a tagline at this hour...)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Fire when Ready.
|
| I'm not an expert, but I think that being proficient in the longbow was difficult, and it was much easier and faster to train soldiers to use muskets. -Andy Lynch ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Howse" <jehowse@yahoo.com> To: (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.fun)
| | | Re: Fire when Ready.
|
| (...) I'm the one who started the move towards having LBow stats in BrikWars. When I was discussing them with Mike, I was only comparing with other bows. As I understand it, the big advantages a musket has are portability (a LBow is easily 6' long) (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.fun)
| | | Re: Fire when Ready.
|
| (...) The chief problem of the longbow was that it took a long time to train a proficient longbowman. It also wasn't as proficient at penetrating plate armor as firearms were, but that's not as significant as the training time. Muskets were deadlier (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.fun)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
