|
|
 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
| (...) Isn't pondering the unaswerables pretty much what philosphy is generally about? You seemed to be interested in writing a lot in response to a question you didn't seem to deem worthy of answering. You seem to want to disagree with this post on (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
| | | | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
| (...) Okay, it looks like you must have had a nice amount of time on your hands in order to come up with such a question - time I would normally spend building. (...) Step back and look at the arrangement of themes. For some reason, the community (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
| | | | | Re: Return of The Random LEGO Set Name Generator
|
| (...) Well, you've got to keep the sea horses somewhere... Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun)
| | | | | Re: Return of The Random LEGO Set Name Generator
|
| (...) I'm on auto-giggle after a long work day... Besides being an interesting way to start a new MOC ("Wheel of Morality, turn, turn, turn, and tell us the lesson we must learn"), some of the names are just beyond funny... for instance, I'm (...) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun)
| | | | | Re: Return of The Random LEGO Set Name Generator
|
| (...) Not so hard, it's already been done. Look at the bottom of this page: (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.trains)
|
|
