|
|
 | | Re: Item Numbers
|
| On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 20:36:16 GMT "Richard Schamus" <legoman34@mindspring.com> wrote concerning 'Re: Item Numbers': [snip] (...) just take a look at some of the lower numbers... set #2 I think has 7 different sets? 214 and 700 have 11(!) different (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Item Numbers
|
| (...) are (...) This is a really complicated question, only because it has a complicated answer. Though I have no idea what The Lego Company actually does, or doesn't do with certain numbers, there is some method to their madness. For some items, (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Item Numbers
|
| I was looking at the list of the item numbers of Scala sets when I started wondering why certain numbers which should be there are skipped. For example, the 18 sets from 1998 have numbers ranging from 3100 through 3120, but there are no sets with (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Addition to acronym list? (Was: Funky stuff (Was: Max's Motorhome))
|
| (...) at (...) this (...) find (...) Hmm... I'd think it doesn't really fit in the acronym list... OTOH, someone (Franklin Cain maybe? I'm not sure) just started a lego 'terms' list. I suggest, ask them and I'm sure that'd be a great addition! (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Addition to acronym list? (Was: Funky stuff (Was: Max's Motorhome))
|
| (...) the (...) is (...) choice. (...) parlance? (...) What I meant to ask is: Shiri, do you feel that this would be appropriate for the acronym list? Perhaps expand it to be a list of terms? Cheers, - jsproat -- Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.faq)
|
|
