 | | Suggestion for LDraw FAQ —Steve Bliss
|
| | | [crossposted to lugnet.faq and lugnet.cad.dev, followup-to set to lugnet.faq] Looking at the LDraw FAQ, it looks like a new level of organization is needed, above the current levels. More precisely, a large number of the topics should be grouped (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Suggestion for LDraw FAQ —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Good idea. Which brings up an issue -- there would probably be a need for more directory levels than just those represented by the newsgroups, and probably just for FAQ items. Todd, how much of an issue is this? Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Suggestion for LDraw FAQ —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Good ideas. My suggestion (to tie into the look and feel and professional style of ldraw.org) would be to rephrase the questions to be a little bit more formal. ie: change 'What is this LDraw Thing?' to 'What is LDraw?' and 'Mailing list?!? (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Suggestion for LDraw FAQ —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) A little informality can be a good thing. The 'Mailing List' question needs to be rewritten anyway, since L-CAD/lugnet.cad.dev is really a newsgroup, not a mailing list. Well, it's both, but it's more effective as a newsgroup (IMO). Steve (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Suggestion for LDraw FAQ —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) At times yes. (...) Correct. Anyways, ldraw.org will be displaying whatever FAQ content the group churns out relating to ldraw (the ldraw faq). -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
