Subject:
|
Re: Suggestion for LDraw FAQ
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 18:46:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1188 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 14 May 1999 00:31:59 GMT, Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote:
> At 02:23 PM 5/13/99 +0000, you wrote:
> > [crossposted to lugnet.faq and lugnet.cad.dev, followup-to set to
> > lugnet.faq]
> >
> > Looking at the LDraw FAQ, it looks like a new level of organization is
> > needed, above the current levels. More precisely, a large number of the
> > topics should be grouped into a fewer number of top-level categories.
> > Here's the current table of contents:
>
> Good ideas. My suggestion (to tie into the look and feel and professional
> style of ldraw.org) would be to rephrase the questions to be a little bit
> more formal. ie: change 'What is this LDraw Thing?' to 'What is LDraw?'
> and 'Mailing list?!? What mailing list?' to 'LDraw Mailing List' or in this
> case, 'LDraw Newsgroups' - you get my point...it sounds too informal or
> juvenile..
A little informality can be a good thing.
The 'Mailing List' question needs to be rewritten anyway, since
L-CAD/lugnet.cad.dev is really a newsgroup, not a mailing list. Well, it's
both, but it's more effective as a newsgroup (IMO).
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Suggestion for LDraw FAQ
|
| (...) Good ideas. My suggestion (to tie into the look and feel and professional style of ldraw.org) would be to rephrase the questions to be a little bit more formal. ie: change 'What is this LDraw Thing?' to 'What is LDraw?' and 'Mailing list?!? (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
