 | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) But don't copy the name 'X-Ref' if you copy the data -- that would be wicked confusing because what you want is a reference to a prior article, and the 'X-Ref' header of NNTP articles *isn't* a reference to a prior article but rather an ID of (...) (26 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) I don't understand the difference -- is it just how the text is formatted, or does that number do some magic? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) It's a semantic difference. - 'References' refers to other articles (ancestors). - 'Xref' is self-referential and refers both to itself and to any other copies of the same article if it has been crossposted. So copying the 'Xref' header (and (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
