 | | Re: RTL query —David Koudys
|
| | | In lugnet.faq, Neb Okla wrote: <snip> (...) THen again, if you look at the history of LUGNET and the postings of individuals, up until relatively recently not much has had to be enforced and no one was banned, and the noise-to-signal ratio has been (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RTL query —Neb Okla
|
| | | | "David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:HoywH4.MLM@lugnet.com... (...) and no (...) opverwhelming (...) the (...) justice is, (...) It's still an authoritarian system. It's good to see that you feel that justice is served and (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RTL query —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.faq, Neb Okla wrote: <snip> (...) Very true. That said, the history of LUGNET compared to the history of rtl where the 'quality' of 'LEGO related postings' (signal to noise ratio) is concerned, I'll take my chances with the admins here at (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RTL query —Neb Okla
|
| | | | FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate "David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:Hoyz39.12rB@lugnet.com... (...) I'll The best way to solve newsgroup Signal to Noise problems is to set a good example and to drown out the noise with good (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RTL query —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) That's *a* way. Calling it "best" is a value judgement. Another way is to exclude the noise if it can't behave itself. In my value system that's a lot better. (...) Which authoritarian organization is that? I'm not aware of one. The mere (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
