To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / 1278
1277  |  1279
Subject: 
Re: Acronym FAQ Updated
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.faq
Date: 
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:47:17 GMT
Viewed: 
4866 times
  
In lugnet.faq, Lar writes:

I agree with Mags, keep them all. Your marking of common and uncommon is
distinction enough. Even the unused ones are interesting curiosities.

Oh, and if you decide to keep the more obscure ones, maybe you could
add TYVM even though it's only been used a few times here.  John N.
really had me stumped on that one, although you can bet now I'll never
forgot what it stands for!  :-)

TYVM,

Maggie



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Acronym FAQ Updated
 
(...) Ya! Thanks. I agree with Mags, keep them all. Your marking of common and uncommon is distinction enough. Even the unused ones are interesting curiosities. (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.faq)

9 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR