Subject:
|
Re: Acronym FAQ Updated
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:47:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4866 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.faq, Lar writes:
> I agree with Mags, keep them all. Your marking of common and uncommon is
> distinction enough. Even the unused ones are interesting curiosities.
Oh, and if you decide to keep the more obscure ones, maybe you could
add TYVM even though it's only been used a few times here. John N.
really had me stumped on that one, although you can bet now I'll never
forgot what it stands for! :-)
TYVM,
Maggie
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Updated
|
| (...) Ya! Thanks. I agree with Mags, keep them all. Your marking of common and uncommon is distinction enough. Even the unused ones are interesting curiosities. (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.faq)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|