 | | Scope of FAQ? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | Todd, Jacob, all, I've been putting together an intro message (kind of a call-to-arms :-) announcing the re-start of the FAQ and a list of Q+A posted to lugnet.faq . But have we determined the scope of the FAQ? How all-encompassing will it be? Is it (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Scope of FAQ? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Start small, plan big. (...) Sure! (...) Sounds accurate to me. (...) If permission is granted explicitly, then sure -- as long as it isn't just dumped in without verifying it (since it's so old). BTW, the acronyms list, probably should IMHO (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Scope of FAQ? —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | Jeremy: (...) Just as I would write it. (...) When we fix the last question about translations and extracting subsets of the FAQ[1]. Play well, Jacob 1) <URL:(URL) ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scope of FAQ? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) You or I could start work on this before translations or FAQ subset extraction are implemented; the bulk of the work in snarfing a FAQ will be to copy the existing questions into their own files and start creating headers. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
