| | What do the set numbers mean?
|
|
Hey all, What is the meaning behind the Lego set numbers? Do they really mean anything? Do certain themes "reserve" numerical series? Are they all 4 digits long? I know they're not all unique. What examples of duplicated set numbers are there? (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
|
| | Re: Temporary home for FAQ-In-Progress
|
|
Hey all, I have just slurped Kerry Garrison's Mindstorms and Lego-robotics FAQ, location at: (URL) LUGNET FAQ index: (URL) file of FAQ source, etc.: (URL) - jsproat (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
<MPG.119ea264f27724d...ugnet.com> Distribution: X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Todd: [...] (...) Good! Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Temporary home for FAQ-In-Progress
|
|
Hey all, I have a working copy of the LUGNET FAQ-In-Progress in a temporary home at my Web site. Check it out at: (URL) can download a ZIP file of the raw FAQ data (1) at: (URL) pretty thin, and not very pretty right now -- but hey, it's (...) (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
|
(...) Cool. I concur. (...) Um, I think it was for a possible alternative organization scheme, other than placement in a subdirectory. If we use index files instead, the Location header is not needed. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) Er... the slurpage stage whereupon the headers and body are transformed into HTML. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) I don't understand the difference -- is it just how the text is formatted, or does that number do some magic? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) Parser? As in document validation or transmogrification? (...) Yup, but not in a bad way as long as some sort of backward-compatible non- CSS code (such as <B></B>) were used in combination with <P></P> for section titles. That is, on old (...) (26 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|