|
|
 | | Re: Who's who in Legoland
|
| (...) might (...) Why not just have two versions of the FAQ? One with images, one without. The content would virtually be the same(1). Jeff 1 - Just a short caption by images would suffice, I think. (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Microfig Borg Cube
|
| (...) Oh, *that* catalog. :-, I thought it was a cheat-sheet sort of thing with mnemonics and all sorts of memory-keeping features. I definitely think that the LDraw FAQ should include a quick-n-dirty cheat sheet, then. Earlier in this thread (1) (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Microfig Borg Cube
|
| (...) (URL), and follow the link to his LEGO page. Steve (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| Another header...? I want to be able to make context-specific notes on the FAQ items, which will not be exposed in the final output. I'm thinking of something like a Comment: header, which the parser will discard during processing. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Scope of FAQ?
|
| (...) You or I could start work on this before translations or FAQ subset extraction are implemented; the bulk of the work in snarfing a FAQ will be to copy the existing questions into their own files and start creating headers. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
