 | | Re: Sheepish question... What does MOC mean?
|
|
MOC = "my own creation"; i.e., something you built/designed yourself, and not something from one of LegoCo's instruction booklets. Franklin (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Sheepish question... What does MOC mean?
|
|
I've been reading Lugnet for ages, now, and was a regular of r.t.l, but I can't for the life of me remember what MOC means. I've got it by context, but I can't place the words with the acronym. (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Sheepish question... What does MOC mean?
|
|
I've been reading Lugnet for ages, now, and was a regular of r.t.l, but I can't for the life of me remember what MOC means. I've got it by context, but I can't place the words with the acronym. (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Done and done. And also age & sex (and inner child too) are done... Thought about adding a special clause on that if anyone wrote something like: YB1980>f or something.... Think they'd have issues... DaveE (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Actually, this has changed a bit in my version (unless you modified your code)... The old range of sets didn't quite go up as high as I thought it should. (I also added some new fields, like # of pieces (P), and a couple others) (...) Ooops... (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
Neat!! Neat neat neat!!! I just *had* to dig up my LGC from last summer, which was a real mission since search is disabled just right now... oh well. ;-) This is what I got: --- How I feel about Castle: They make OTHER themes? Royal Knights: If I (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Ok, now I've got two strikes against me. I went ahead and made my own new-ish version of the LGC WITHOUT talking to Derek (et all?) first. Strike one. Strike two is that I made an INTERPRETER and a DESCRIPTION of my new version of the LGC, but (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Model: "Valour" Advanced Gunship
|
|
Here are two entries already in the LUGNET FAQ that may help: How can I set the "Followup-To" when posting a message via e-mail? (URL) can I set the "Followup-To" when posting a message via the web? (URL) Beaudin" <shiningblade@home.com> wrote in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: New Model: "Valour" Advanced Gunship
|
|
How are you posting (NewsReader, Web Browser or email)? Jude FUT lugnet.faq (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: hello?... (was "where is latest version of lego geek code")
|
|
(...) Sorry, I was busy. Derek's is the more recent. (...) That'd be kinda cool on the web interface ..... Steve (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hello?... (was "where is latest version of lego geek code")
|
|
(...) Probably not. Can't think of anyone I know of who might know, short of Todd maybe... I don't think it's been a really hot topic though... Anyone heard of anything recently? (Within the last couple years?) (...) "greater"... dunno about "later" (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | hello?... (was "where is latest version of lego geek code")
|
|
Hello? Did anyone capable of answering my question see this message? I'd appreciate an answer. :-( Thanks, Franklin (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
|
(...) No problem. ;-) Thanks for answering, BTW. I'm _still_ waiting for an answer to the _other_ question that I posted (in ".faq"), though... ;-) Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
|
(...) Aha! I get it. Oops, sorry for your time then. ;-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
|
(...) How bad is it? When I need it, I really really need it, and I'd be willing to have to go through a "do you really mean to do this, it's gonna be slow and you may wait a long time because I'm gonna set the priority on this thread really low so (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | How many pieces in Spark and Flare?
|
|
I saw <set:8521 Flare> and <set:8522 Spark> yesterday. Not for the first time, of course, but it was the first time I looked at the number of pieces on the boxes. Spark had 33 pieces, and Flare had 42. In the Lugnet Guide, and in a LS@H catalog (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | How many pieces in Spark and Flare?
|
|
I saw <set:8521 Flare> and <set;8522 Spark> yesterday. Not for the first time, of course, but it was the first time I looked at the number of pieces on the boxes. Spark had 33 pieces, and Flare had 42. In the Lugnet Guide, and in a LS@H catalog (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
|
(...) It's not, no. It'd be there now if I knew how to make it execute efficiently. --Todd (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
|
(...) Let me explain. :-) The info at the URL you gave me, i.e., using plus signs in front of the keywords, will guarantee that all results of the search will have those keywords _in_ _any_ _order_. They do _not_ guarantee that I will find a (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
|
Hi Franklin and anyone else -- This question was answered not long ago I think, and was added to Cary Clark's (extremely useful) FAQ...: (URL) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
