|
|
 | | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
| (...) How bad is it? When I need it, I really really need it, and I'd be willing to have to go through a "do you really mean to do this, it's gonna be slow and you may wait a long time because I'm gonna set the priority on this thread really low so (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | How many pieces in Spark and Flare?
|
| I saw <set:8521 Flare> and <set:8522 Spark> yesterday. Not for the first time, of course, but it was the first time I looked at the number of pieces on the boxes. Spark had 33 pieces, and Flare had 42. In the Lugnet Guide, and in a LS@H catalog (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | How many pieces in Spark and Flare?
|
| I saw <set:8521 Flare> and <set;8522 Spark> yesterday. Not for the first time, of course, but it was the first time I looked at the number of pieces on the boxes. Spark had 33 pieces, and Flare had 42. In the Lugnet Guide, and in a LS@H catalog (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
| (...) It's not, no. It'd be there now if I knew how to make it execute efficiently. --Todd (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: search by "Phrase" (not "Keyword[s]")
|
| (...) Let me explain. :-) The info at the URL you gave me, i.e., using plus signs in front of the keywords, will guarantee that all results of the search will have those keywords _in_ _any_ _order_. They do _not_ guarantee that I will find a (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.faq)
|
|
