 | | Re: BrickFest 2007 location
|
|
(...) On the other hand, of course, it may not be as attractive an option for those who wish to drive (18 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest 2007 location
|
|
(...) And that is very true. Many fans drive, they wish to bring creations, and airline travel limits that to a large extend. So, there is ONE city in the USA (guess which one) that can be reached by 2/3 of the entire US population within a 12 hour (...) (18 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest 2007 location
|
|
Hello all, As a DC area fan, I'm partial to keeping there event here; and in terms of general improvement every year and a steady attendence on public day it seems to me to make sense to keep it in the same town every year. That said, if BrickFest (...) (18 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest 2007 location
|
|
(...) OK Paul--Columbus would not be bad (18 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest 2007 location
|
|
(...) I like the Minneapolis option. Prices are cheap here in the Midwest and there are plenty of direct flights for those that don't want to sit (BTW, if you're a COA or DAL Freq Flier, you earn miles on NWA), not to mention, NWA serves MSP from (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest 2007 location
|
|
(...) Versus what? where? It makes it more centrally located. on any of the coasts makes it hard for many people to drive. And it is less expensive than more major cities. The question was basically if the convention is to be held somewhere else, (...) (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
