 | | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
In lugnet.events, Anthony Sava wrote: Snip (...) After lamblasting Anthony for his estimate of time, I would like to support him a little on his arguement here. I think it is a little disengenous for an organizer not to be upfront with where the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Why? Still not following the logic. As an attendee, I paid my money and received value, and my hobby is being furthered by positive public attention. As a volunteer, I get warm fuzzies and the adoration of my peers for participating in such a (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) You don't think there's anything wrong with acting like a nonprofit but operating as a private, for-profit enterprise? The IRS would like to have a stern talk with you. Not that BF has been pretending to be a nonprofit, but I don't think the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) "Because I'll be more likely to help if I know", "Because I'll be more likely to donate if I know", "Because I'd be willing to pay more if I know", "Because I'm more likely to attend if I know". You're absoutely right-- It's a capitalist (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) You bet they would. But BF has always been a privately held company, as far as I know, and never a non-profit. Being a non-profit requires specific paperwork (like what LEGOFan filed). So unless BF filed as non-profit, that's not an issue. (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Those are all decent answers. It sounds like there's a discrepancy of tense... my comments in this thread have all been aimed at the past tense, why should an attendee of an event want to know information about what they've just attended. (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) It started out as an event (URL) run by a local LUG>. I'm not sure when or how the transition happened. The fact that BF was a business has been out there for a while - if you were looking for it. But BF has never felt like a business, what (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Never said it was an ideal scenario. I was just pointing out what is rather than what might be preferred. And the way it is right now is that the intellectual property for the name "BrickFest" is held by AMH Productions, who holds all the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Well... yeah? Shouldn't we be talking about consequence? (...) Oh, I'm not referring to any actions specifically-- I'm following what appears to be your stance to its absolutist conclusions to test the validity of your claim. Your claim (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Sure, but that's a slightly different conversation. (...) I'm a heartless bastard. Ask my kids. :) You're free to draw the above conclusion, although it's incorrect. The conversation has morphed into something different from what I thought I (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) The phrase "BrickFest is a Trademark of Brick Events LLC" started showing up on the website by (URL) July 19, 2002> at the latest. The (URL) Wayback Machine> isn't showing me the results for the beginning of 2002. The 2002 event was the first (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure BrickFest 2000 had a registration fee. I know that it was pointed out at one point that even in 2000, the facility was NOT free (I had been under that impression, and I know when conversation started about BF2001, perhaps even (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Thanks, Frank, and sorry about the mistake. I had no recollection of the fees, and was just going by (URL) exchange> - which I thought pertained to the registration, but since there was a fee in 2001, they must have meant that the space was (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) SPACE!!! ROSCO (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.fun, lugnet.space, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) LOL (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
