|
|
 | | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote: (snip) see (URL) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) I agree with your statement. What I disagree with is those who complain it's TLC's fault when their creations aren't "real" enough. -Orion (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) Fooey. I enjoy the challange of trying to build something realistic in my medium. And I choose LEGO as my medium. Jason Spears | (URL) BrickCentral> | (URL) MichLUG> (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) This part has already been spotted, but it's not quite the same design. She asked for a 3x3 33 degree triple corner slope (wow, I hadn't really noticed how 3-centric that part was...), but the one shown in the scan is a 4x4 18 degree triple (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
| | | | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| Hey, It looks like your part 22 is found in the new Titan XP set (scan provided by IanGreg: (URL) ): Scroll down in the fifth column from the left: (URL) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
| | | | | just a silly question re: LEGO & AFOLS
|
| Dear LEGO: Is there anything you learned about the AFOL market in the last few years that really surprised you, really 'knocked your socks off'? JohnG, GMLTC (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
| (...) Hi Marlon, For the greatest part, you are right of course. For me, sets are only a bunch of useful (or useless) parts. So, it doesn’t matter in which form LEGO put it in a box. And I can take it or leave it. Their only mistake was the change (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Well, a lot of the pieces you showed would make sense to complete the Lego system. BUT we are talking of TLC, so waiting for a solution that would make sense is most propably a waste of time. Unless of course they would need one of the bricks (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment)
| | | | | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
| (...) Thanx to everyone who replied! I'm glad to hear from those on both sides of the fence... After making my post I started thinking more about what Lugnet is for, and voicing likes and dislikes is amongst them... so I hope I didn't rub anyone the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) What you have to look at is the age ranges. Harry Potter, which is similar to older castle in complexity and use of parts, is 8+,7+,8+. Knights Kingdom is 5+,6+,7+. Its one step up from Jack Stone. If you want to compare the old castle stuff (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
|
