 | | Re: what else could be done —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | (...) Why on earth do you want those? The only thing I like better is the fact they only use one tube per cylinder, but most times it's not a problem. I'd much rather have longer cylinders in the new style. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | hi when talking about cylinders or pistons maybe 2 way piston would be nice to previously discussed (yes tobbe i should use this word :)) T shape "angle" connector i would add cross shaped definitely dividing by 3 is not too simple by nature of (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Krieg
|
| | | | (...) Maybe it's a little selfish of me to say "I want them so I can build more engines more easily". But, if I had them I would use them! They represent the cylinders of internal combustion engines a little better than double acting do. I know it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) Ah! Engines! I forgot about that application, sorry! I was rather stunned somebody prefered the old ones :) /Tobbe (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
