 | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) Dear Lego, Please fire this guy and hire someone who realizes that these kinds of products (Bionicle, Racers, Galidor, even the Throwbots) are the wrong direction for your company. You make great contruction toys and the best bricks around but (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 4582 Red Bullet
|
|
Benjamin -- I agree -- the hard plastic integrated tire/axlehole things do not represent Lego's finest hour. They're just cheesy, the kind of thing you'd expect to find on some $.99 Rite Aid toy. Aesthetics aside, I haven't yet found a surface where (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish list for lego legends
|
|
(...) I guess that is the most scientific way... and what might have prompted Lego to start putting out the legends, to get some of the market of "rare" but awesome and highly demanded sets. (...) good point....but there is two points to look at (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish list for lego legends
|
|
A scientific method would be to take the original RRP and apply the inflation factor of the years since release and then divide that into the current average ebay prices for that set. If you believe in the supply-and-demand equation, the sets that (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The January 2002 catalog contains an error... Still!
|
|
(...) XFUT lego.direct as I believe it may be more appropriate (and it's where you may get an official response... hopefully you're more than just *wishing* the catalog were fixed :-) ) ++Lar (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
