 | | Re: I WANT FOLIAGE!!! (was Re: How Many Cypress Trees Would You Order?)
|
|
(...) Maggie, Maggie, Maggie... Don't you recall that I have A VICIOUS STREAK A MILE WIDE? But thanks for forcing me to prove this in a public forum. I was purposefully running up the price on the bigger fool, fool enough to pay those prices. At the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: I WANT FOLIAGE!!! (was Re: How Many Cypress Trees Would You Order?)
|
|
(...) Um, I don't think he dares do that... because if he did, his sweetie might give him a kiss. And you know what happens to frogs when they get kissed! They turn into princes. That would completely destroy his rep here. ++Lar (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: I WANT FOLIAGE!!! (was Re: How Many Cypress Trees Would You Order?)
|
|
(...) Okay Richard, someone has to say this, and I don't mind doing so because I know what a nice person you really are in spite of the reputation you try to cultivate here, so if you chew my head off I'll know it's because you are trying to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: I WANT FOLIAGE!!! (was Re: How Many Cypress Trees Would You Order?)
|
|
(...) REALLY (...) me too me too ME TOO!! greens please! Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Lego auctions: (URL) Guild of Bricksmiths: (URL) Lego Web page: (URL) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | I WANT FOLIAGE!!! (was Re: How Many Cypress Trees Would You Order?)
|
|
Previously, I wrote this: (...) Today I bid on this: Lego #5192 CYPRESS TREES X6 SERVICE BAGS! Item # 1609955387 which closed at $109.50 USD. Why didn't I win this auction? Because that is WAY TOO MUCH @$$%!#@ MONEY to spend on such a thing, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Legal ramifications of posting? (Was: Re: A campaign for sun and planet gears)
|
|
Your concern has merit. A posting on a news group could most definately be viewed a "prior art" and effectively prevent Lego from receiving a patent on the design. And from some of the Lego history I have viewed on the web they appear to be very (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Legal ramifications of posting? (Was: Re: A campaign for sun and planet gears)
|
|
"DA" == David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> writes: DA> Given that TLC has a patent on its bricks design and still lost DA> the case against MegaBlocks (or was it another brand?) I think DA> that in any other scenario you should prepare for (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Legal ramifications of posting? (Was: Re: A campaign for sun and planet gears)
|
|
(...) IANAL, but it seems to me that: Most of the pieces that were mentioned in this thread (and other related threads) are simple modifications of existing pieces (make XYZW part shorter, separate ABCD into two pieces, remove the bump from 1234...) (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Legal ramifications of posting? (Was: Re: A campaign for sun and planet gears)
|
|
(...) If I suggested the part, I'd be VERY glad they made it, as it would probably already be "built" into many MOCs that couldn't be built without it. -- | Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support | Netscape Communications Corp | A division (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Legal ramifications of posting? (Was: Re: A campaign for sun and planet gears)
|
|
"SB" == Simon Bennett <simon.bennett@ntlworld.com> writes: SB> I have a plan to go back over these posts and compile a list, SB> perhaps to suggest that we could model some in LDRAW so we can see SB> how they might work. What do people think? What (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
