 | | Re: LEGO General/Harry Potter Rant (Was - Re: Harry Potter Creator box art)
|
|
(...) The entertainment industry has portrayed the good guys as young and handsome, while the bad guys are old, fat, ugly, ect. It has been ingrained into us from birth. Just check out those soap operas that women watch and you'll see. And the only (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestions for future re-release LEGO items
|
|
(...) YEESSS!!! I don't know why I didn't think of this! :] I would add to it a request for service packs of the transparent pieces (mostly canopies and windows). By offering these and the printed pieces we could build pretty much any Classic Space (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Suggestions for future re-release LEGO items
|
|
Dear LEGO, I have a request in anticipation of the "classic" sets to be re-released through LEGO Shop At Home. If you will be considering Classic Space or Futuron, please do include the following items: Mini-figure sets for both themes Service pack (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle Armor Accessory Pack
|
|
(...) Another good point! But here is the one area where AFOL are VERY different than the average consumer -- we will actually pay such a price! The average consumer would buy only if the price was right. I think TLC could make up in quantity what (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle Armor Accessory Pack
|
|
Here are some calculations: The only difference between 5138 and 5059 is that 5138 has the 2 armors and one extra small shield. The difference in price between the two is 0.75 pounds, which converts to $1.07. So I'm guessing that Lego "values" the (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
