|
|
 | | Re: What would it take?
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) <Snip> I think alot of us are still bitter over the introduction of juniorisation nad the change in marketing strategy. I think for many, it came as a total surprise. Most of us grew up during (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: What would it take?
|
| (...) I see your frustration, Dave!, and I'm sure others feel the same way. We've seen a lot of negative reactions to stuff LEGO is or isn't doing. I know they're trying their best to do their job and to work with us, and I _know_ there is a lot (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: What would it take?
|
| (...) Here's where I disagree with you- I definitely feel that we are better off LEGO-wise than we were even as recently as, say, 1998 or 1999. The sets are better, with far less juniorization; we have bulk packs available, and more on the way; we (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | | What would it take?
|
| With the recent Microsoft announcement, a number of us have expressed opinions of varying negativity for reasons ranging from the well-founded to the kneejerk. Similarly, following the implementation of the bulk sale service, quite a few people (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Questions about creator
|
| (...) I dunno about the new figures. They are certainly better proportioned, but also slightly "dumbed down", as their hands cannot twist. But then again, it looks a bit like their head has a ball joint, like the Technic figures. A good thing is (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
|
