 | | Re: Dear Lego stuff
|
| (...) Mmm, definitely agree. (...) If you really regret it, you could go cancel that article. (...) That was kind of the idea behind the ng more than P&M group. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Dear Lego stuff
|
| (...) Done! I was used to Dejanews before I found my newsreader. Anytime you wanted to cancel messages there, it posted your cancellation message without any reference to content. After seeing that, I figured I'd just apologize rather than putting (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Dear Lego stuff
|
| Cancel a message? How on earth could you do that? I am assuming you were discussing a message already posted.......___...___ richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam dot Web Sight: (URL) Instant Messenger: RJD88888 ICQ 13177071 ___...___ (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Dear Lego stuff
|
| (...) Yep. From Netscape 4.05 Edit|Delete on any message you posted. (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Dear Lego stuff
|
| (...) It's a fairly standard Usenet thing. It's also really easy to abuse -- it's easy to forge a cancel message for someone else's post. So a lot of servers are set to ignore them, which sorta makes the whole thing not work. Hopefully there will be (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Dear Lego stuff
|
| Alas, I am unable to delete anything anyway. I would only be interested in deleting a too-strong flame (mine, not someone else's). Thanks for your help...! ___...___ richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam dot Web Sight: (URL) Instant Messenger: (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
