 | | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Add me to the list. I definitely think it's time for some answers. (...) Key words: MUTUAL BENEFIT. We get what we want (better sets, pieces, consumer service (ala Theme Gallery Pics)...and they get what they want, more money. Not because they (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Yeah, the bulk is just remodled parts packs to me, not true bulk. (...) Seem's like it to me... (...) TLC may be seeing it, but I don't think that they understand how many people feel this way and one letter TO THEM instead of to the dear lego (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Exactly right. Progress and cooperation from Lego does not and will not happen until we go outright and state our concerns. It should not have to go this far at all. Lego should be able to recognize out concerns BEFORE we have to tell them (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzJ048.I8r@lugnet.com... (...) maybe (...) teeny (...) deals (...) discount. Yep - at least the current round of bulk is a disappointment, but it can be looked at as a step in the right (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
I dunno. Bulk has actually been a disappointment to me -- there were maybe three items I wanted in the initial offerings (tiles, foliage, and those teeny windows), the rest was overpriced and pointless to me. I have made many deals of late that were (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
