To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 23
22  |  24
Subject: 
Re: Dear Lego stuff
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:30:42 GMT
Reply-To: 
rocketman@shielSTOPSPAMMERSdfamilyradio.com
Viewed: 
1149 times
  
I agree. If we take the time to do it right, and it carries more weight. Do it
the other way and Pandora's box would open. Suddenly we'd get a reputation for
"spouting off" at the drop of a hat because it is so easy to send e-mail.

I would rather they find out about this ng by osmosis, so they would feel
comfortable dropping in when they felt like it. Then, they might be more open to
suggestion.

The best thing we could do when we make these posts is to be intelligent
sounding. Use manners when thinking them out. Don't use lots of capitals for
emphasis, and things like, "Town Jr. sucks". I did that post on lugnet.reviews,
and now I regret it. Rather than complain, point out solutions as to how things
could be better. Managers and designers love that sort of thing as it gets ideas
brewing.

Perhaps a Princess.... wrote:

I disagree. If we send them to an email address at Lego I'd say there
is a good chance it'd never get read. There's a slightly better chance
if they get snail mailed as a group to Lego.

The BEST chance, though, of getting what you say heard by LEgo is to
write them directly, yourself. I have a feeling 10 people writing them
separately means more than all in one group.

--
From Tom McDonald
Anti-spam block in place.
http://mbr-hobby.neotown.com/radiotitan/lego/lego.html
radiotitan@yahoo.com


--
Do what you can, but behave yourself.

We'll have more, right after this.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Dear Lego stuff
 
(...) Mmm, definitely agree. (...) If you really regret it, you could go cancel that article. (...) That was kind of the idea behind the ng more than P&M group. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dear Lego stuff
 
(...) I disagree. If we send them to an email address at Lego I'd say there is a good chance it'd never get read. There's a slightly better chance if they get snail mailed as a group to Lego. The BEST chance, though, of getting what you say heard by (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR