Subject:
|
Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:22:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4534 times
|
| |
|
|
> As far as the haves vs. have-nots issue goes...GROW UP. The bottom line is
> that the choices we make in life (what job do we take? how much education
> do we have? married or single? kids or no? lego vs. food?) determine
> which camp we end up in. If our choices put us in the have-not camp WHO ARE
> WE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE PERKS EXTENDED TO THE HAVES?!?! I chose to be
> where I am...Larry didn't put me here.
>
> Will
I believe this last comment was directed at me. I need to apologize if anyone
got the idea that the haves and have nots issue has anything to do with money
or egalitarian economics. Only that a certain segment has access to the lego
sets and the other segment doesn't. And while I am only 24 and might need to
Grow Up...misunderstanding my statements might have been easy. Jumping to
quick conclusions is also easy...
I realize this adds nothing to the debate. But I needed to clear up the
confusion. I used those terms for quickness not for their economic meaning.
Sorry,
Craig Livingston
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
| (...) keeping it (...) price, (...) make (...) with a (...) You can always sell it yourself at a loss. Although this is not a very practical business model there's no escaping the fact that some products are dogs and you'd do well to get something (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego) !
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
