To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1647
    Re: an update -- and an apology —Tom Stangl
   I don't think we need to limit the COLOR, only the type. Supposedly they will have to mold the LD bricks on demand, or in large batches. In that case, there should be no reason why they can't mold them in "strange" colors while they are filling (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
   
        Re: an update -- and an apology —John Neal
      (...) Hmm. Not the way I understood his meaning. Others? -John (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
    
         Re: an update -- and an apology —Nick Goetz
     I think light blue and orange 2x4 bricks should be a possibility. Obviously the 2x4 brick is an option and light blue should be because it is in a current Throwbot/Slizer set. ((URL) However I can easily see how this type of request would fit under (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
    
         Re: an update -- and an apology —Richard Earley
       With all the desire out there for non-common colors, I think TLC sees the potential for profit. But in the beginning, I think they will be comming out with already produced color/part combinations. The easiest way to get the bulk parts to begin (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
    
         Re: an update -- and an apology —Tony Priestman
     On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Nick Goetz (<Fqp333.MwC@lugnet.com>) wrote at 14:06:32 (...) I hadn't noticed that. Do we have to wait till late summer? (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
   
        Re: an update -- and an apology —Steve Bliss
   (...) I don't think so, and here's why: doing one part in different colors is (probably) treated as a different production run for each color. And it's doubtful that LD will want to stock an entire production run of a single part in a single color. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
   
        Re: an update -- and an apology —Scott Arthur
    (...) Agreed 100%. I think we are looking after sought after volume parts which are in current sets. I'm thinking of parts like castle walls, 4561 thin wall windows and the like. I doubt you'd ever get parts like 4561 nose as those parts only have (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
   
        Re: an update -- and an apology —Steve Bliss
     (...) Right. BUT, I'd also like to see a low-volume purchase option, where we (the insane) could purchase any current parts which aren't availble in service packs (or bulk purchase). This would be buying in small volumes, for a premium unit price (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
    
         Re: an update -- and an apology —Tony Priestman
     On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Steve Bliss (<ld7obsggkqkh3cuh77...kh1hsj2@4a x.com>) wrote at 19:38:49 (...) Or we could do it. I can see the potential for cooperatives/syndicates being set up to buy the bulk volume that LD will want to sell, and then (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
    
         Re: an update -- and an apology —Steve Bliss
     (...) Except I am expecting that there will always be a large number of parts which will not be offered through bulk sales. I don't remember the exact number, but between all the product lines (if that's the right term -- System, Technic, DUPLO, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
    
         Re: an update -- and an apology —Ben Gatrelle
     (...) from (URL) "2,069 is the total of different moulded elements in 1998. There are 77 LEGO PRIMO elements, 435 LEGO DUPLO elements, 175 LEGO SCALA elements, 1061 LEGO SYSTEM elements, 205 LEGO TECHNIC elements and 116 LEGO DACTA elements - and (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
   
        Re: an update -- and an apology —Jonathan Wilson
   (...) How do you know this? -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR