 | | Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | It's not like it matters much. They only seem to look for the phrase "I would like to suggest..." and then they send you a form letter. Jeff (...) a (...) way. (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Which, to this consumer anyway, is much less effective than an individually written letter would be. :-) I was at the LIC at MoA in MPLS last nite (met with John Neal, that was fun... more in the mpls group later this AM) Before we met I was (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —David Blomberg
|
| | | | It would be useful to post addresses and names of individuals that we should write to. (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) Agreed. I've been following the "we should write letters" thread, and (while I come down on the non-form letters side) I agree that it is a good thing. However, most people don't have the slightest clue of where to send such a letter. Could (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) ^^^...^^^ (...) ^^^...^^^ If you mean assistance in concealing the identity of a poster who wants to post the name and/or address of a TLG employee, then the answer is No Way; anonymous postings are against the Terms of Use of the lugnet.com (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) by (...) post (...) anonymous (...) Absolutely! I was unclear. Even disregarding the Terms of Use (which I'm not), I have personal moral objections to the forwarding of private information, anonymous or otherwise. What I had meant to state is (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
