To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1347 (-5)
  Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
 
Let me add my voice to this chorus. Small is beautiful -- particularly when it comes to cardboard boxes. Consider too, that smaller boxes would allow a toy store to stock more LEGO sets, providing more retail throughput in the same amount of space. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: New policy for LS@h
 
(...) How is TLC responsible for Canadian taxes? I think this is something you should take up with your federal and provicial governments. -- David Schilling (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  New policy for LS@h
 
Hello, I'm very desappointed about the fact that TLC has decided to close the warehouse in Ontario, Canada. Now when I want to buy from LS@H, I have to pay the US$ price + 15%HST (harmonized sales tax)! At least, before our prices were lower than in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: LEGO BABY set
 
Here's another cool use for the rings (thought I'd put my camel to work): (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.primo)
 
  Re: Adult lego sets.
 
(...) corrently making one named after an ocean creature that is not a fish. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)  


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR