 | | Re: TLCs stance on stop-motion films? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I think as long as the Lego logo wasn't prominent (perhaps even not apparent), you'd be far within your rights. I mean, most things you see used in movies are made by _someone_, even those not there because of licensing deals. Now, if your (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: TLCs stance on stop-motion films? —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) I neglected a key point in my original question that might change the senerio somewhat. What if one was to use minifigs as "actors" in a film. (Obviously one cannot use the Darth Vader minifig, but what about the tattooine luke if it is not (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: TLCs stance on stop-motion films? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) One probably _can_ use the Darth Vader minifig if it's a parody. And if you're not making any money off of this, free speech rights go a long way. (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: TLCs stance on stop-motion films? —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Well half of the question is could one sell it. (assuming anyone would want it.) I am thinking of making a feature length film. (~2 hours) I have over 20,000 US$ worth of Lego elements. My question is could I use that as the medium of the film (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: TLCs stance on stop-motion films? —Matthew Verdier
|
| | | | Mike Petrucelli wrote in message ... (...) over (...) just (...) give (...) figs?) (...) About a month ago in Orlando there was a film festival made up of shorts from amateur and novice filmmakers. They were all very odd artsy films. One was made (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
