To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1163
1162  |  1164
Subject: 
Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:17:08 GMT
Viewed: 
1302 times
  
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:07:18 GMT, "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com>
wrote:

I honestly don't think his comment there deserved the harsh reply.  Not trying
to jump on you, but I just see [his comment] as simple sarcasm used in the
context of a flame message alone.  I would assume that people here at Lugnet
would know we don't treat the hobby as 'just for kids.'

It probably was sarcasm, but I still see it as highly inappropriate.

Like using your cellular during church service at the Notre Dame de
Paris or at the St Peter of Rome.

BTW - I wish I had joined this thread earlier...but its been a while since
I've donned the flame suit (in cad.*) and slung a classic one (fried JW
anyone?) :)  IMO the thread originator was being a classic example of a bad
egg.

I agree. But why bother flaming the clueless ones? They don't
understand you even if you do..

Jasper



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
 
(...) trying (...) Yes, I see. (...) True, true. But for the most part a lot of us in cad were just too ticked off at him to see that. Besides, it gave me some practice :) Anyways, he's improved greatly since the whole CFV thing that almost had him (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
 
[could have posted this to .fun, it belongs in .rant, but whatever...] (...) You could have stopped after 'service'. Or any other public gathering/performance. Inconsiderate users of noisy devices bother me greatly. Especially the ones that are (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
 
(...) I honestly don't think his comment there deserved the harsh reply. Not trying to jump on you, but I just see [his comment] as simple sarcasm used in the context of a flame message alone. I would assume that people here at Lugnet would know we (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR